![]() ![]() I thought they were awful and listed them on EBay right away. I had one set of those Ti diaphragms and that mess was part of what led me to designing the MAHL’s to begin with. It might sound better then the old one did but replacing worthless with bad is not an option I would choose. All you have done is refresh the OEM diaphragm with one that will sound shrill and tinny and are not cheap. In the case of the Ti diaphragms you still have that old horn and magnet and phase plug. Whether it is the Ti diaphragm bandage on the 2.5cm lens like those on a Forte or Chorus or Cornwall 2 and on, or thinking that you can reuse the old magnet assemblies, even if you could which you can’t though, why? Why take inferior parts of old designs long since passed by with current state of the art designs which sound much better, and cripple new parts with bad pieces. Why would you want to reuse any part of these old Klipsch tweeters is beyond me. ![]() Now I think it is time to explain something here before I go any further. They just assume I guess that everything fits everything because it will save them money by reusing that old dog barker K-77 magnet and diaphragm assemble. I think some make assumptions about their K-77’s without ever having taken them apart. Perhaps the most common one is what driver do you intend to use. However for the sake of avoiding bad choices on the buyers part I am learning to ask questions about intended use. There are times when I get people who want to buy just a set of SMAHL lenses from me, which of course I am delighted to do.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |